How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style Warning the Gullible About Global Warming

You are searching about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style, today we will share with you article about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style is useful to you.

Warning the Gullible About Global Warming

Isn’t it strange that, with all the talk about Global Warming (GW), we

just had one of the coldest winters we’ve had in a long time? The 2007

Farmers’ Almanac, whose predictions are up to 85% accurate, predicts

frigid temperatures, as much as 20 degrees below seasonal norms (and

nearly 40 degrees colder than last winter), for Montana, the Dakotas and parts of Wyoming. For the Gulf Coast up through New England,

unseasonably cold, or “shivery,” conditions are expected. Snow, and

lots of it, is also forecast for the nation’s midsection, parts of New

England, and the mountains of the Pacific Northwest. “The Great Lakes

and Ohio River Valley may be the only area spared the extreme cold,”

reveals Sandi Duncan, Managing Editor, “but this is not to say this area

won’t be without its cold spells and significant snowfalls.”

Wonder why THAT hasn’t made the news!

We recently ministered to an 11-year old who was literally in tears

with fear over the GW scare they’d been discussing in school. The

child reasoned that, “If the world is ending; why bother with anything

but huddling together with my family?”

Every natural disaster that takes place these days is being blamed on GW.

Many world leaders are accepting GW as Gospel truth. A recent survey

revealed that 33% of Americans see GW as a very real threat to our

existence. TV shows such as Discovery’s “Planet Earth” are showy,

elaborate propaganda pieces for the GW agenda.


A news headline recently read: “Global Warming is not due to human

contribution of Carbon Dioxide.” Dr. Tim Ball is the Chairman of the

Natural Resources Stewardship Project, is a Victoria-based

environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the

University of Winnipeg. In a February 5, 2007 article entitled, “Global

Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?” Ball writes: “Global Warming, as

we think we know it, doesn’t exist. And I am not the only one trying to

make people open up their eyes and see the truth…few listen, despite

the fact that I was one of the first Canadian Ph.Ds. in Climatology and

I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the

reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on

human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have

a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England

and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For

some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is


“What would happen if tomorrow we were told that…the Earth is flat?

It would probably be the most important piece of news in the media

and would generate a lot of debate. So why is it that when scientists

who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years say that

humans are not the cause nobody listens?

“Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution

of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This, in fact, is the greatest deception in the

history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars

while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with

no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags

about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate

change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible

scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations

and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.

“…if we don’t pursue the truth, we are lost as individuals and as a

society… there is no evidence that we are, or could ever cause, global

climate change…So how has the world come to believe that something

is wrong?

“Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global

cooling was the biggest threat: a matter of faith. “It is a cold fact: the

Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important social,

political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten

thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it

is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our

species,” wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.

“I was as opposed to the threats of impending doom global cooling

engendered as I am to the threats made about Global Warming…I am

not denying the phenomenon has occurred. The world has warmed

since 1680, the nadir of a cool period called the Little Ice Age that

has generally continued to the present. These climate changes are well

within natural variability and explained quite easily by changes in the

sun. But there is nothing unusual going on.”


Is GW a fact? Yes, actually. As Dr. Klaus Toepfer, executive director

of the United Nations Environment Programme, remarked, “More and

more, people around the world are aware that there is climate change.

Nobody is questioning that any longer.”

But don’t buy every opinion being pitched by Hollywood “scientists”

like Alec Baldwin, Leonardo, Tom Hanks, Will Farrell and movies like

“The Day After Tomorrow.” They’ve taken the bate being offered by

everybody’s favorite ex-Veep-now-Movie-Maker Al Gore and his

global warming crusade. More on him coming up (you’ve been warned).

Is GW OUR fault? No, it’s not. Though the European Parliament has

called for trade sanctions against the United States unless it agrees to

curb its CO2 emissions, more and more scientists are speaking out

AGAINST those who say mankind is to blame. Climatologist Pat

Michaels of the CATO Institute stated, “Climate changes, yes…but

climate has changed in the past without human beings having anything

to do with it…”

If we were to embrace what environmentalists say, we’d all believe

the polar ice caps are melting and America’s coasts will be submerged

soon. Don’t start building an ark just yet. If we consider that the North

Pole is a giant ice cube floating in the ocean, if that melts at Summer’s

end, that means nothing to sea level. The South Pole, is the largest ice

mass on the planet. Experts say it is gaining ice, not losing it.

The temperature of our planet has been fluctuating, at least, since the

invention of the thermometer. They say it was warmer 1,000 years ago

than it is today, but that it started cooling. Colonial America was gripped

by the last days of The Little Ice Age, with some of the deepest snows

and coldest temperatures in recorded North American history. Remember

Valley Forge? Jefferson wrote about life during the tail end of this climate

change. In his book, “Notes on the State of Virginia”, he wrote, “The snow

used to lie on the ground for months at a time; now it only does so for

weeks or days…”

It lasted into the 1800s. 1816 was known as the “year without summer.”

Today, some climatologists are more worried about another ice age than

global warming. CBN News reports that, ” these experts have been

drowned out by a worldwide movement that has branded global-warming

skeptics as evil, even comparing them to people who deny the existence

of the Holocaust.”

CBN goes on to say, “At least part of the European Left’s hatred of

George Bush is his refusal to sign onto the Kyoto Protocol (KP), an

agreement among industrialized nations to lower their carbon dioxide

emissions as a way to fight against global warming. But it is not all

President Bush’s fault – under President Clinton, the Senate killed the

treaty 95 to nothing. But at the 2005 G-8 summit in Scotland, British

Prime Minister Tony Blair pushed President Bush to finally join the

global warming fight.

Though he symbolically signed it, Bush declared, “America’s

unwillingness to embrace a flawed treaty should not be read by our

friends and allies as any abdication of responsibility. To the contrary,

my administration is committed to a leadership role on the issue of

climate change … Our approach must be consistent with the long-term

goal of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.”

It’s been stated that the reason the U.S. won’t ratify the agreement is that,

unlike Europe, we recognize that the Kyoto Protocol will do nothing

measurable about global warming. In other words, “G. Dubya” hasn’t

fallen for the whole GW-thing. By one estimate, it would make a

difference of only seven one-hundredths of one degree Celsius after

50 years – an amount too small too measure. The European response

seems to be, “At least we’re doing something!”

Yes, they are doing something. From the Bush administration’s

perspective, they’re wasting money that they could use to invest in the

technologies of the future, throwing it at solar energy and windmills. It’s

been pointed out that the biggest supporters of KP in the industrialized

world have the worst economies, most with double-digit unemployment

(the US is at a mere 4.4%, incidentally). Critics of Kyoto say signing on

would take from our gross domestic product billions annually. New

technologies could eventually replace fossil fuels, if these nations don’t

first cripple their own economies with concepts like KP.

CBN reports, “Stephen Milloy, who runs, says

corporations have been caving in to pressure from environmentalists.

He said, “Global warming pushers are going company by company,

getting corporate management to be supportive of either the KP or other

GW provisions. And eventually, they’re going to develop enough political

support among corporations that corporations will begin forcefully

lobbying for GW restrictions in the U.S.”


“Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the

truth as they see it,” Al Gore insists in his film “An Inconvenient Truth.”

Very true, Al. Let’s ask ’em: “What do world climate experts actually

think about the science of Al’s movie?”

Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James

Cook University, says: “Gore’s circumstantial arguments are so weak

that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are

commanding public attention.”

Carter must certainly be part of what Gore sites as a tiny cadre of

“climate change skeptics” who disagree with the “vast majority of

scientists.” Y’think?Actually, according to Tom Harris, Executive

Director of Natural Resources Stewardship Project, Carter is one of

hundreds of highly qualified non-governmental, non-industry, non-lobby

group climate experts who contest the hypothesis that human emissions

of CO2 are causing significant global climate change. According to

Harris, “Climate experts” is the operative term here. Why? “Because

what Gore’s “majority of scientists” think is immaterial when only a

very small fraction of them actually work in the climate field.”

Though many scientists focus their global change studies on everything

from polar bears to poison ivy, they are not all to be considered climate

change experts.

Carter writes, “We should listen most to scientists who use real data to

try to understand what nature is actually telling us about the causes and

extent of global climate change. In this relatively small community,

there is no consensus, despite what Gore and others would suggest.”

He gives a sampling of the side of the GW debate we almost never


Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson – “There

is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth’s temperature

over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten

times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet

was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion

years…how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small

increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century’s

modest warming?”

“Patterson concluded his testimony by explaining what his research and

“hundreds of other studies” reveal: on all time scales, there is very good

correlation between Earth’s temperature and natural celestial phenomena

such as changes in the brightness of the Sun…Antarctica has survived

warm and cold events over millions of years. A meltdown is simply not

a realistic scenario in the foreseeable future,” said Carter.

Gore tells us in the film, “Starting in 1970, there was a precipitous

drop-off in the amount and extent and thickness of the Arctic ice cap.”

This is misleading, according to Ball: “The survey that Gore cites was

a single transect across one part of the Arctic basin in the month of

October during the 1960s when we were in the middle of the cooling

period. The 1990 runs were done in the warmer month of September,

using a wholly different technology.”

A paper published in 2003 by University of Alaska professor Igor

Polyakov shows that, the region of the Arctic where rising temperature is

supposedly endangering polar bears showed fluctuations since 1940 but

no overall temperature rise.

Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography

and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden – “For several

published records it is a decrease for the last 50 years,”

Carter goes on to say, “Concerning Gore’s beliefs about worldwide

warming…in addition to the cooling in the NW Atlantic, massive areas

of cooling are found in the North and South Pacific Ocean; the whole of

the Amazon Valley; the north coast of South America and the Caribbean;

the eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, Caucasus and Red Sea; New

Zealand and even the Ganges Valley in India. …”

“Gore’s point that 200 cities and towns in the American West set all time

high temperature records is also misleading,” Carter asserts.

Dr. Roy Spencer, Principal Research Scientist at The University of

Alabama in Huntsville – “It is not unusual for some locations, out of the

thousands of cities and towns in the U.S., to set all-time records,” he

says. “The actual data shows that overall, recent temperatures in the

U.S. were not unusual.”

Carter adds,”The man [Gore] is an embarrassment to US science and its

many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state

publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science.”

How’s that for a critique? Hollywood gave this film an Academy award

for Best Documentary – which speaks volumes to me – and Gore has been

nominated to receive the Nobel Prize in October for his wide-reaching

efforts to draw the world’s attention to the dangers of Global Warming.

Deception is everywhere, all the time.

As others have already stated, just follow the money and those who

worship it to find out what’s really happening here. Whether its Gore’s

‘carbon offset’ concept that would make him the richest man in town

(by the way, he owns a company* you’d buy credits from that would

help us each to reduce our carbon “footprint” – a concept intended to

get us accustomed to paying a usage fee for fossil fuels), or a proposed

CO2 Tax intended to reduce emissions do solve a problem that’s not

even proven to exist, somebody’s cranking up their money machine over

this supposed catastrophe.

*The offset provider invests your money in tree planting projects and

other similar projects that take the place of the environmental impact of

your emissions – car, business, air travel. An offset purchased through a

nonprofit company might help preserve a forest in the Northwest, or it

might help with rainforest restoration in Ecuador. That does NOT mean

there will literally be a tree in the Ecuadorean rainforest with your name

on it. Unfortunately, customers will not get to choose how their donations

are distributed. One possible place where your money may go, for

example, is to project intended to reduce CO2 emissions at truck stops

would allow drivers to plug in their trucks at night rather than leave them



Environmentalists say we cannot continue to spew CO2 into the air. I agree

that we should be the best stewards of the planet that God has given us.

But I’ve also read that more air pollution is coming from the open cooking

fires of Chinese villages and gas omitted by the world’s farm animals than

by our cars and factories. Not kidding!

The skeptics answer that the world is doomed. Such talk instills fear in

people and fear is faith in the devil. As Christians, our faith is SUPPOSED

to be in God.

Be anxious for NOTHING!

Fear not, the Lord is with you!

The extreme views on both sides of the aisle are all any of us ever hear

about in regard to this issue. It seems to me that there is always something

we can ALL always do better. But I can live the healthiest lifestyle ever

known to man, eating right, exercising, avoiding cigarettes and alcohol, but

I could be run over by a beer truck at any moment. Likewise, we can take

wonderful care of this Earth, but when we’ve had our run, our run is over.

Heaven and Earth will pass away, but God’s Word will never pass away,

Jesus said. Prophecy WILL be fulfilled. Things WILL get worse before they

get better.

In the meanwhile, we, The Church, have a Great Commission with which to

keep ourselves occupied. We won’t change this world by lobbying, debating,

making propaganda films, taking shorter showers or car-pooling. That’s not,

after all, what Jesus directed us to do.

I love this planet. I really do, but let’s make sure to worship the Creator and

NOT merely His creation.

Every blessing…

Video about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style

You can see more content about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style on our youtube channel: Click Here

Question about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style

If you have any questions about How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!

The article How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!

Rate Articles How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style

Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 8640
Views: 25788772

Search keywords How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style

How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style
way How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style
tutorial How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style
How Many People Can Earth Support With Swedish Life Style free
#Warning #Gullible #Global #Warming