How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style Critical Analysis of The Space of Literature by Maurice Blanchot

You are searching about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style, today we will share with you article about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style is useful to you.

Critical Analysis of The Space of Literature by Maurice Blanchot

Maurice Blanchot though he is one of the weight of Literature many are ignored by the mainstream public because of the inconsistency of his work. Blanchot’s document is still beautiful like a piece of Baroque opera with a theme of philosophy running through it. I want to talk about the thoughts I came to while reading his expansion: The Source of Literature.

Maurice Blanchot began his career as a character Writing as a Discontent. What is solitude in everyday life? It means that in the calm of tranquility. It is questionable whether the writer wrote out of solitude or excitement. He quotes Rilke: ‘I have not done any work: I myself have affected me’. Why can’t a writer be anxious when he writes his work? I’m sure that Nietzsche wrote: Thus spake Zarathustra in a fit of rage. A Freudian ID has provoked the necessity of writing. Even mystics when they meditate are never in solitude. Being in a state of deep thought. One can write out of passion for writing but one cannot be in solitude when one is in the state of writing. When one is in the process of writing, one gravitates to the source of meaning. So I want to update Blanchot’s personality as happy, anxious, passionate and thoughtful. The mind can never be in solitude.

Again Blanchot added that the writer never knows whether his work is finished or not. In one sense it is true and in another sense it is not. A work of Literature is only a part of art for the understanding of success. But then again in writing, there is a beginning and an end. Let’s take the example of Ulysses by James Joyce. The novel runs to eight hundred pages and tells about twelve hours of human life mainly Bloom, Stephen and Molly. There is a beginning and an end to the work. Blanchot is partially right when he says that no art is complete. A piece of art receives only degrees of perfection. Similarly Blanchot also emphasizes that the reader enters into solitude when encountering the work. Readers of fiction are readers. The work of the great reader is marked by the phenomenology of reading. The mind of the serious reader works as a communication machine. Reading refers to what has been read previously. The ontology of existentialism, autobiographical has the reader to play while reading. There is a wonderful reading but only a poor translation.

It is from nothing that the word becomes a writer into life. I want to refute this statement by saying that writing is an acknowledgment of presence, saturation of it. Do is pronounced in the meaning. In writing there is indulgence in the meaning of action. Writing is more than action. Existence is a guarantee for the writer.

Again he added that the writer never read his work. That can be true to some extent. Is the writer really willing to edit it or work? The writer does not act as the reader. The author only proofreads his work.

For a writer, a word is something that cannot be known. How can that be? The writer is a speech-maniac. He finds new uses for existing ones. It also creates new words: for example neologisms. A writer invents tropes of language. How can this be done without wisdom? Writing is not sterile but active and dynamic.

Writing is about breaking the relationship between word and self. I would say that writing is catharsis. The relationship between writing, words, and identity is an integral one. Writing is like sex. Identity and words are tied to the writer.

Writer is a language that no one speaks. Yes, writing is creative and finding new ways of discovering meaning. Tropes are words of nascence and newness. Writing is a process of self-discovery.

When we praise the voice of the work, we are not referring to the structure or the virtue of the words but to the silence. Blanchot was not sure what this silence was all about. We are in fascination and catharsis when we are exposed to the images used by the author. There is wisdom and a happy mind. We do not face the task in silence.

What is a journal? It’s not romantic, it’s not important to confess. He is a writer when he is not writing. I think Blanchot is being vague there. Again he added that a book written out of fear and anxiety. Journal writing is no longer history. Romanticism gets a new meaning on the blog. Taste, art and culture are all romanticized by bloggers gaining new knowledge. As Wordsworth said ‘poetry is the horror of imagination’. To be romantic is in the state of mind that is in passion. Writing a book is also acceptable. To confess is to be diligent and open. I wrote about adultery as a confession. It is wrong to say that a journal is not history. For example let’s take Ann Frank. Ann Frank was a passionate fighter against the persecution she faced during the Nazi regime. So the newspaper can be recognized, romantic and historical.

Writing is freeing up time. I would like to disagree with the comments. The writing time flows according to the stream of consciousness. There is time to think and think when a writer is engaged in writing. Writing cannot be marked by a lack of time.

Fascination is solitude’s gaze. To write is to let fascination rule the words. The view of the writer can be sexual, one; it may also be subjective, philosophical, materialistic and transcendental. The face is intentional and is out of attack in ID.

Again he said of Mallarme: ‘When I write in verse, I face nothing, no God and my own death. It is questionable to ask Blanchot, how negation can enter the realm of writing. Negation is nihilism, a negative acceptance when something good does not happen. Writing is self-published and accepted. Yes, after Nietzsche declared that ‘God is dead’, writing became more and more suspicious. How does the writer enter the world of death? Does the writer kill himself when he enters the train of writing? According to Camus, when writing we enter into suicidal thoughts. There is the death of the real self and the birth of the creative self.

Again Blanchot goes on to distinguish between the word crude and the word ornamental. When we say that the flower is in the garden we use crude language or language of communication. If I use: I am the flower of his lips, I am ornamentally decorating the words. The writing is ornamental, fancy and hyperbolic. Again he added: poetry is the world of words where relationships and structures are obtained through sound, image and rhyme. Poetry is like the music of words, and it flows with the Dionysian rhythm and evokes the Orpheus of images.

Kafka began his writing out of true despair. We should know that Kafka had a good relationship with his father. He was also an exiled Jew. Kafka despises rules. Writing for Kafka grew out of the struggle against democracy. This is especially true when we analyze his work-Metamorphosis. The work is allegorical and expresses the rejection of the individual by the laws. The person in Metamorphosis is reduced to fragments. Writing for Kafka was a spiritual and emotional salvation. Kafka admitted that nothing more than literature interested me. The more Kafka writes: the less is he of himself.

Art is the essence of unhappiness not its comfort. How can art be remembered on the unhappy one? One can experience art through the consciousness of joy and acceptance. Let’s examine Picasso’s painting of Guernica. Was Picasso filled with anger at the bombing of the Basque? Or he claimed to be creative when painting Guernica. When I think about Dali’s painting: The persistence of Memory, I am filled with cathartic meaning. I appreciate his point to describe time as consciousness. I was also amazed at the sheep clock placed on the frozen embryo and interpreted it as Dali’s own oedipal trauma.

Video about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style

You can see more content about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style on our youtube channel: Click Here

Question about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style

If you have any questions about How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!

The article How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!

Rate Articles How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style

Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 4966
Views: 39241839

Search keywords How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style

How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style
way How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style
tutorial How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style
How Do You Do A Works Cited Page Chicago Style free
#Critical #Analysis #Space #Literature #Maurice #Blanchot

Source: https://ezinearticles.com/?Critical-Analysis-of-The-Space-of-Literature-by-Maurice-Blanchot&id=9769047